Technology in Theory and Practice: "Hack This! Contesting Technological Neutrality at Technology in Theory and Practice”
Guest Writer: Mel Stanfill
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
posted under
critical race theory
,
Dan Savage
,
digital humanities
,
Elsevier
,
Gadamer
,
google
,
hacktivism
,
Keitges
,
Safia Noble
,
Stewart Brand
,
Technology
,
Ted Underwood
by Unit for Criticism
[On April 2, 2012 the Unit for Criticism held its annual Graduate Student event. This year it was a panel of three graduate students on the topic of Technology in Theory and Practice. Below guest writer Mel Stanfill, one of the panelists, writes the second of two posts on the event.]
"Hack This! Contesting Technological Neutrality"
Written by Mel Stanfill (Institute of Communications Research)
The consensus was clear at the Technology in Theory and Practice graduate student panel: across the various disciplinary homes, theoretical frameworks, and methodological approaches of the participants, technology is not a neutral tool that can magically solve our problems without any input from us.
Mark Keitges (Education Policy, Organization, & Leadership) critiqued the idea that education can be optimized through carefully controlled design. In particular, he used Hans-Georg Gadamer's idea of “being pulled up short” to highlight the role of uncertainty and surprise in education. Because being jolted out of our complacency and worldview is a productive experience, “improving” designs to make the learning process smooth isn't an improvement at all. Instead of “distributed cognition," in which some of the work of thinking is relocated into the technology, Keitges seeks recognition that the capacity for learning doesn't reside in the technology but in the interaction. He called for an “ill-structured design” that affords such moments of disjuncture.
Safiya Umoja Noble, (Graduate School of Library & Information Science) was similarly interested in disrupting narratives that claim that technology cures what ails society. Noble was concerned with the ways “black girls” appear when these search terms are “Googled,” finding that the results that appear first, far from ushering in a new era under Stewart Brand's slogan “information wants to be free,” operate entirely within the orbit of old stereotypes that reduce African-American women and girls to their sexuality. She was particularly concerned because Google search is typically presented as not only neutral but also a “public good” that improves life by making information available to the masses.
Noble was critical of the ways Google has at times specifically disclaimed responsibility and identified objectionable results as “the algorithm's fault”--even when such results are produced by gaming their system, as in neo-Nazis Googlebombing the word “Jew” or, to add a lighter example, Dan Savage's campaign against Rick Santorum.
My own presentation for the panel, which derives from my work in communications research may seem to diverge from these perspectives by arguing for the usefulness of data analysis software to critical research. However, my work nevertheless resonates with that of my co-panelists: like them, I believe that the software is only as good as what the user puts into it. With insightful interpretation on the part of the researcher, software can turn micro-level analysis into macro-level insight by showing patterns in how social categories are understood—in my case, sports and science fiction fans, but the principle is portable—across disparate cultural locations.
Within these three papers, despite their great variance with respect to topic and discipline, then, a number of commonalities emerged. Keitges and Noble are both interested in the ways that technology's design renders certain uses more or less possible in ways that then affect the world (as, in other work, is Stanfill). Noble and I want to expose and contest the ways in which certain ideas get produced as the reality of the categories in our research and how this helps perpetuate unequal power relationships. And, while Noble and I disagreed about the usefulness of data analysis software, ultimately our points are similar: analytical software is helpful when (and only when) researchers need to keep track of large bodies of things.
This combination of commonality—in seeing technology as an important site of interrogation—and divergence—in how the presenters approached it—formed the heart of the faculty response, provided by Ted Underwood, who identified the panelists as participating in a form of critique that he compared to “hacktivism”: Keitges was hacking design, Noble was hacking search, and I was hacking research.
In place of the disciplinary silo effect, or even inderdisciplinary silos such as the contemporary movement for Digital Humanities Underwood called on his listeners to hack scholarly communication itself. This starts, of course, with bringing such a panel and audience together in the first place.
However, Underwood also called for hacking scholarship by recognizing that the technologies that organize us as scholars are no more neutral and independent of human action than Google or educational interfaces or data analysis software. The academic publishing system, for example, is a technology, and recent activism to contest scientific publisher Elsevier's pricing practices, resistance on the part of academics to the Research Works Act, and broader initiatives for open-access publishing (and for recognition of open-access publications as legitimate) are also modes of hacking scholarly communication.
And indeed, Kritik itself is part of the hacking all of the panel's participants ultimately find necessary—in providing a public forum, this blog works to contest the common sense about what technology is for, how to use it, and what will be seen as a legitimate way to get knowledge about the world.
If, as the panelists argued, technology is only as good as what we do with it, let's do something with it. Hack this post. Remix it. Transform it.
"Hack This! Contesting Technological Neutrality"
Written by Mel Stanfill (Institute of Communications Research)
The consensus was clear at the Technology in Theory and Practice graduate student panel: across the various disciplinary homes, theoretical frameworks, and methodological approaches of the participants, technology is not a neutral tool that can magically solve our problems without any input from us.
Mark Keitges (Education Policy, Organization, & Leadership) critiqued the idea that education can be optimized through carefully controlled design. In particular, he used Hans-Georg Gadamer's idea of “being pulled up short” to highlight the role of uncertainty and surprise in education. Because being jolted out of our complacency and worldview is a productive experience, “improving” designs to make the learning process smooth isn't an improvement at all. Instead of “distributed cognition," in which some of the work of thinking is relocated into the technology, Keitges seeks recognition that the capacity for learning doesn't reside in the technology but in the interaction. He called for an “ill-structured design” that affords such moments of disjuncture.
Safiya Umoja Noble, (Graduate School of Library & Information Science) was similarly interested in disrupting narratives that claim that technology cures what ails society. Noble was concerned with the ways “black girls” appear when these search terms are “Googled,” finding that the results that appear first, far from ushering in a new era under Stewart Brand's slogan “information wants to be free,” operate entirely within the orbit of old stereotypes that reduce African-American women and girls to their sexuality. She was particularly concerned because Google search is typically presented as not only neutral but also a “public good” that improves life by making information available to the masses.
Noble was critical of the ways Google has at times specifically disclaimed responsibility and identified objectionable results as “the algorithm's fault”--even when such results are produced by gaming their system, as in neo-Nazis Googlebombing the word “Jew” or, to add a lighter example, Dan Savage's campaign against Rick Santorum.
My own presentation for the panel, which derives from my work in communications research may seem to diverge from these perspectives by arguing for the usefulness of data analysis software to critical research. However, my work nevertheless resonates with that of my co-panelists: like them, I believe that the software is only as good as what the user puts into it. With insightful interpretation on the part of the researcher, software can turn micro-level analysis into macro-level insight by showing patterns in how social categories are understood—in my case, sports and science fiction fans, but the principle is portable—across disparate cultural locations.
Within these three papers, despite their great variance with respect to topic and discipline, then, a number of commonalities emerged. Keitges and Noble are both interested in the ways that technology's design renders certain uses more or less possible in ways that then affect the world (as, in other work, is Stanfill). Noble and I want to expose and contest the ways in which certain ideas get produced as the reality of the categories in our research and how this helps perpetuate unequal power relationships. And, while Noble and I disagreed about the usefulness of data analysis software, ultimately our points are similar: analytical software is helpful when (and only when) researchers need to keep track of large bodies of things.
This combination of commonality—in seeing technology as an important site of interrogation—and divergence—in how the presenters approached it—formed the heart of the faculty response, provided by Ted Underwood, who identified the panelists as participating in a form of critique that he compared to “hacktivism”: Keitges was hacking design, Noble was hacking search, and I was hacking research.
In place of the disciplinary silo effect, or even inderdisciplinary silos such as the contemporary movement for Digital Humanities Underwood called on his listeners to hack scholarly communication itself. This starts, of course, with bringing such a panel and audience together in the first place.
However, Underwood also called for hacking scholarship by recognizing that the technologies that organize us as scholars are no more neutral and independent of human action than Google or educational interfaces or data analysis software. The academic publishing system, for example, is a technology, and recent activism to contest scientific publisher Elsevier's pricing practices, resistance on the part of academics to the Research Works Act, and broader initiatives for open-access publishing (and for recognition of open-access publications as legitimate) are also modes of hacking scholarly communication.
And indeed, Kritik itself is part of the hacking all of the panel's participants ultimately find necessary—in providing a public forum, this blog works to contest the common sense about what technology is for, how to use it, and what will be seen as a legitimate way to get knowledge about the world.
If, as the panelists argued, technology is only as good as what we do with it, let's do something with it. Hack this post. Remix it. Transform it.
30 comments:
Thanks so much, Mel, for this sharp summary of a great conversation.
Just to extend my thoughts about disciplinarity a little: I actually don't object to "disciplinary siloes" as such. If a discipline supports the kind of inquiry you want to pursue, then I'm all for it. In cases where a discipline isn't working for you, I would say: just create a different community. That's how we got "the digital humanities," and I think moving outside existing disciplines was absolutely a useful move in that case.
I might also characterize DH as more "extradisciplinary" than interdisciplinary. To me, scholarship is interdisciplinary when people still feel institutionally based in English departments or what have you, but do intellectual work that crosses disciplinary boundaries. DH feels a little different in the sense that it's really building its own institutions and infrastructure, both on the web and in the more traditional form of journals and conferences, etc. But I don't think it's likely to become a "department" either. And it includes about as many academic professionals as it does faculty. In short, it's something kind of anomalous.
I found myself wonder to read this article. This is pretty impressive and here you have pointed out some superb details. Thanks for sharing this with your readers.
Personalized Gifts for Kids
cheap ed pillsImprove every aspect of your sex life! Longer staying power, increased performance & faster recovery.
hepsibahis Hepsibahis güncel web sitesine buradan direk giriş yap. Youwin adı ile bilinen Türkiye ve Kıbrıs üzerinden canlı bahis ve casino slot oyun hizmeti veren siteye erişim sağlayın. Hepsi bahis firması için yeni giriş adresi sadece burada.
Business News OIBNews is India's leading network by NDTV and CNN contributors. It has been serving the best out of the mess from World and India.
baanpolball บ้านผลบอล (baanpolball) อัพเดทตลอด 24 ชั่วโมง ราคาบอลวันนี้ วิเคราะห์บอลแม่น ฟรีๆ ทุกคู่ 100% ทีเด็ดบอลวันนี้ 4 คู่ ราคาบอลไหล แบบเรียลไทม์
judi online
FINanCE
FBDown
รับซื้อรถยนต์
British shorthair for sale We have been branded as the best cattery for breeding healthy kittens and puppies ready for a home.
dankwoods,
dank woods,
canim sohbet Android Dear ChatCanım chat is growing day by day with the android chat service it has given to you and serves you, dear chat lovers, free of charge. You can connect and chat online at any time of the day with your smart devices on our chat site. Anonymous chat is a free chat site that allows you to chat randomly and does not charge any fee or money from our valued chat users.
Casinos Now Compare the best legit online casinos that pay real money including the best crypto casinos, best mobile casinos and the best online casinos in 2021
Hire Jeewangarg.com the PPC Expert in Delhi
, India & maximize your sales at the lowest cost. Jeewangarg is a certified Google AdWords Specialist in Delhi. Therefore, if you are in search of potential customers from Google, there is no substitute for our excellence PPC service.
Testing Lab in Delhi- STRC providing testing facilities to the industries worldwide. We assure trusted quality control by testing your products with highly accurate measuring.
Pakistani Designers are synonyms to luxury fashion house defined by eternal sophistication, elegance and glamour. The designers have an innate and typical sense of style and a passion for creating contemporary designs, and this philosophy has been the defining force behind the fashion label, that is familiar for its innovation, gorgeous expertise and exceptional attention to detail. Buy the latest outfits designed by the Pakistani Designers at Panache Haute Couture at remarkable price and discount.
Sandblasting is also known as abrasive blasting. Primarily, sandblasting is a procedure of by forcibly propelling a stream of sandblasting material against a surface. The sandblasting operation is done under high pressure to smoothen a rough surface, shape to eradicate its contaminants. There are various variants of sandblasting procedures like bead blasting, shot blasting, and Soda Blasting, however, if you are in search of the best and powerful Sandblasting Machinery contact Quality Spare Center for the best of machinery and sandblast materials.
Very good addition. This article has excellent points and I’m glad that I’ve read this. Get Affordable SEO services at a cheap price!!!
Very good addition. This article has excellent points and I’m glad that I’ve read this. Get Affordable SEO services at a cheap price!!!
World News
Connect is the Business Centers Dubai that offers an ideal choice for fledging companies to easily establish with instant, flexible and ready to use professional office spaces and wide range of services to set up quickly.
Very nice blog, Thanks for sharing great article.
You are providing wonderful information, it is very useful to us.
Keep posting like this informative articles.
Thank you.
From: Field Engineer
For more information about: it security operations engineer
Nice blog site dear I'm about to suggest this to all my listing contacts.
Bigpond webmail support
Thank you, for providing these tips. Personally,
I believe the best strategy is to repurpose the old content into a new useful one.
The new report by Expert Market Research titled, ‘Global Chocolate Market Report and Forecast 2022-2027’, gives an in-depth analysis of the global Chocolate Market, assessing the market based on its segments like categories, product types, growth, qualities, processed types, applications, and regions. The report tracks the latest trends in the industry and studies their impact on the overall market upcoming years. The chocolate market is being driven by the growing demand for chocolate in the food and beverage industry, as a popular flavouring ingredient. For instance, chocolate is used in producing cookies and cakes, and can also be found in beverages, Additionally, the wide variety of chocolates available in the market are also attracting further consumer investments, which is expected to positively impact the market growth. The major players in the market are Nestlé S.A., Ferrero Group, Mars, Incorporated, Mondelez International, Hershey Co., Barry Callebaut AG, and Kerry Group plc, many others are lead of this industry. Expert Market Research provides market intelligence across a range of industry verticals which include Pharmaceuticals, Health, Food and Beverage, Chemical and Materials, Energy and Mining. For more information about us, Kindly visit our website also.
Great work....keep it up
om international provides the service of packers and movers
Thanks for sharing the information. One of the best ways to grow your business is to do free guest posting. If anyone wants a site that provides free guest posting service. I will be sharing a website that provides free guest posting services. You can go and upload your article.
How to contact Samsung printer support?
Samsung Printer Support offers various communication modes such as phone support, email support to chat support to its customers. You can choose any of these modes to interact with them. Your issues will be patiently attended to by one of their technical experts.
Here is the detail How to Get Cricket World Cup 2023 Semi-Final Live Score? The Cricket World Cup 2023 is going on with a blast of fun and energy this year.
Post a Comment